<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 128 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66900</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s revisionary powers regarding the sales tax penalty, deduction of Rs. 3,67,723, and deduction u/s 32AB, finding the assessment erroneous in these aspects. However, the Tribunal vacated the Commissioner&#039;s order on the joint venture loss and initiation of penalty u/s 221, stating no error in the assessment on these issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 10:44:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 128 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66900</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s revisionary powers regarding the sales tax penalty, deduction of Rs. 3,67,723, and deduction u/s 32AB, finding the assessment erroneous in these aspects. However, the Tribunal vacated the Commissioner&#039;s order on the joint venture loss and initiation of penalty u/s 221, stating no error in the assessment on these issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>