<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 116 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66879</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s ruling that the return did not qualify under the amnesty scheme due to concealment of income before detection. The decision highlighted the significance of voluntary disclosure and the repercussions of concealment in tax cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 18:32:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 116 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66879</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s ruling that the return did not qualify under the amnesty scheme due to concealment of income before detection. The decision highlighted the significance of voluntary disclosure and the repercussions of concealment in tax cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>