https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66865 The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction of the bonus payment and provision for bonus based on evidence provided later by the assessee, despite initial lack of proof filed with the return. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of depreciation on vehicle maintenance and premises maintenance expenses due to insufficient details. The addition in the trading account was set aside for further verification, while the disallowance of Delhi branch loss was affirmed. One appeal was dismissed as infructuous, and another was partly allowed based on the Tribunal's findings on the raised issues. en-us Thu, 18 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Mar 2011 17:41:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66865 The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction of the bonus payment and provision for bonus based on evidence provided later by the assessee, despite initial lack of proof filed with the return. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of depreciation on vehicle maintenance and premises maintenance expenses due to insufficient details. The addition in the trading account was set aside for further verification, while the disallowance of Delhi branch loss was affirmed. One appeal was dismissed as infructuous, and another was partly allowed based on the Tribunal's findings on the raised issues. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 18 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66865