<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (6) TMI 102 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66852</link>
    <description>Sale consideration received under an unregistered sale deed, where possession had already been delivered, was treated as part of the assessee&#039;s wealth and not as a refundable liability. The purchaser&#039;s possession was protected under part performance, and the assessee had no enforceable contractual obligation to refund the amount. Mere non-registration did not convert the received consideration into a liability, and even if legal title was incomplete, the money remained with the assessee without any restitutionary duty. Section 65 of the Contract Act was held inapplicable on these facts, so the inclusion of the consideration in wealth was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 17:17:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (6) TMI 102 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66852</link>
      <description>Sale consideration received under an unregistered sale deed, where possession had already been delivered, was treated as part of the assessee&#039;s wealth and not as a refundable liability. The purchaser&#039;s possession was protected under part performance, and the assessee had no enforceable contractual obligation to refund the amount. Mere non-registration did not convert the received consideration into a liability, and even if legal title was incomplete, the money remained with the assessee without any restitutionary duty. Section 65 of the Contract Act was held inapplicable on these facts, so the inclusion of the consideration in wealth was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>