<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (4) TMI 116 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66843</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals, confirming that Oswal Trading Co. was not a genuine firm but merely an alias of Ghasiram Kaluram. Therefore, the income of Oswal Trading Co. was rightly included in the income of Ghasiram Kaluram, and the disallowances of salary and interest payments were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 16:56:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (4) TMI 116 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66843</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals, confirming that Oswal Trading Co. was not a genuine firm but merely an alias of Ghasiram Kaluram. Therefore, the income of Oswal Trading Co. was rightly included in the income of Ghasiram Kaluram, and the disallowances of salary and interest payments were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>