<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (10) TMI 137 - ITAT HYDERABAD-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66832</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the income attributable to Rs. 37,000 from the lorry purchased in the current year is includible in the assessee&#039;s total income under section 64, but not the income attributable to the remaining amount. The deletion of Rs. 23,561 relating to unexplained investment by the assessee&#039;s wife was upheld due to lack of evidence of transfer by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 16:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (10) TMI 137 - ITAT HYDERABAD-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66832</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the income attributable to Rs. 37,000 from the lorry purchased in the current year is includible in the assessee&#039;s total income under section 64, but not the income attributable to the remaining amount. The deletion of Rs. 23,561 relating to unexplained investment by the assessee&#039;s wife was upheld due to lack of evidence of transfer by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>