<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 263 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66826</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that the notice under section 148 was invalid and the disallowed depreciation claim of Rs. 16,20,35,856 was deemed admissible. The reassessment under sections 143(3) and 147 was declared invalid due to lack of satisfying conditions for invoking section 147. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision annulling the reassessment and deleting the Revenue&#039;s demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 263 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66826</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that the notice under section 148 was invalid and the disallowed depreciation claim of Rs. 16,20,35,856 was deemed admissible. The reassessment under sections 143(3) and 147 was declared invalid due to lack of satisfying conditions for invoking section 147. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision annulling the reassessment and deleting the Revenue&#039;s demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>