<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 470 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66817</link>
    <description>Undisclosed stock detected in a survey that immediately led to a same-day search remained assessable as undisclosed income under the block assessment regime. A survey under section 133A is limited to inspection and recording statements without oath, whereas a search under section 132 is based on prior information and reason to believe, with stronger evidentiary consequences. Where the survey and search formed one continuous operation and no formal disclosure had occurred before the search, the excess stock did not lose its character as undisclosed income. The special search-based assessment procedure therefore applied, and regular assessment was not the proper forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 470 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66817</link>
      <description>Undisclosed stock detected in a survey that immediately led to a same-day search remained assessable as undisclosed income under the block assessment regime. A survey under section 133A is limited to inspection and recording statements without oath, whereas a search under section 132 is based on prior information and reason to believe, with stronger evidentiary consequences. Where the survey and search formed one continuous operation and no formal disclosure had occurred before the search, the excess stock did not lose its character as undisclosed income. The special search-based assessment procedure therefore applied, and regular assessment was not the proper forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>