<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 249 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66816</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the revenue&#039;s petition to vacate the conditional stay order due to the assessee&#039;s failure to comply with payment and security conditions. The assessee faced challenges in meeting the conditions but failed to seek modification of the order. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of obeying its orders, awarded costs to the revenue, and directed the assessee to pay a nominal sum as costs for non-compliance. Compliance with Tribunal orders was underscored as crucial in the case outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:53:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 249 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66816</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the revenue&#039;s petition to vacate the conditional stay order due to the assessee&#039;s failure to comply with payment and security conditions. The assessee faced challenges in meeting the conditions but failed to seek modification of the order. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of obeying its orders, awarded costs to the revenue, and directed the assessee to pay a nominal sum as costs for non-compliance. Compliance with Tribunal orders was underscored as crucial in the case outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>