<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (8) TMI 131 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66799</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the reopening of assessment under s. 147(b) for the quantum appeal, leading to the dismissal of the quantum appeal. The penalty under s. 271(1)(a) was upheld, while the penalty under s. 271(1)(c) was cancelled due to a variance in valuation reports not constituting concealment of income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:34:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (8) TMI 131 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66799</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the reopening of assessment under s. 147(b) for the quantum appeal, leading to the dismissal of the quantum appeal. The penalty under s. 271(1)(a) was upheld, while the penalty under s. 271(1)(c) was cancelled due to a variance in valuation reports not constituting concealment of income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>