<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (10) TMI 81 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66789</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, holding that the returns filed by the assessee on 30th Nov., 1984, were valid and the assessments for the assessment years 1976-77 to 1979-80 were barred by limitation as they were not completed within one year from the date of filing the returns. The Tribunal refrained from expressing any view on the alternative argument that the notices under Section 17 should be construed as issued under Section 17(1)(b) and not under Section 17(1)(a).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:08:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (10) TMI 81 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66789</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, holding that the returns filed by the assessee on 30th Nov., 1984, were valid and the assessments for the assessment years 1976-77 to 1979-80 were barred by limitation as they were not completed within one year from the date of filing the returns. The Tribunal refrained from expressing any view on the alternative argument that the notices under Section 17 should be construed as issued under Section 17(1)(b) and not under Section 17(1)(a).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>