<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (6) TMI 72 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66785</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming that the revised return filed by the assessee was invalid, the exemption under Section 54(1) was rightly denied, and the ITO had no jurisdiction to entertain fresh claims or change the status during reassessment. The orders of the Dy. Commissioner (A) were upheld as just and correct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 12:31:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (6) TMI 72 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66785</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming that the revised return filed by the assessee was invalid, the exemption under Section 54(1) was rightly denied, and the ITO had no jurisdiction to entertain fresh claims or change the status during reassessment. The orders of the Dy. Commissioner (A) were upheld as just and correct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>