<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (3) TMI 137 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66783</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the additions of Rs. 32,000 under Section 68 and Rs. 31,931 under Section 69A of the IT Act were not justified. The Tribunal determined that the assessee had adequately proven the identity and capacity of the creditor, as well as the genuineness of the transactions. The appeal was allowed, and the additions made by the lower authorities were reversed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 12:24:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (3) TMI 137 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66783</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the additions of Rs. 32,000 under Section 68 and Rs. 31,931 under Section 69A of the IT Act were not justified. The Tribunal determined that the assessee had adequately proven the identity and capacity of the creditor, as well as the genuineness of the transactions. The appeal was allowed, and the additions made by the lower authorities were reversed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>