<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 149 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66780</link>
    <description>The appeal regarding the addition of Rs. 14,000 as income from other sources was dismissed as the tribunal found the assessee failed to convincingly prove the source of the investment. However, the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was canceled as the tribunal concluded there was no conclusive evidence of deliberate concealment or filing of inaccurate particulars by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 12:17:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 149 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66780</link>
      <description>The appeal regarding the addition of Rs. 14,000 as income from other sources was dismissed as the tribunal found the assessee failed to convincingly prove the source of the investment. However, the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was canceled as the tribunal concluded there was no conclusive evidence of deliberate concealment or filing of inaccurate particulars by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>