<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 461 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66776</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, declaring the reopening of the assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act as invalid due to non-compliance with notice requirements. It ruled that the income from the sale of agricultural land should be treated as capital gains, not business income. The Tribunal admitted additional grounds, emphasizing the necessity of providing reasons for reopening assessments, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2024 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 461 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66776</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, declaring the reopening of the assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act as invalid due to non-compliance with notice requirements. It ruled that the income from the sale of agricultural land should be treated as capital gains, not business income. The Tribunal admitted additional grounds, emphasizing the necessity of providing reasons for reopening assessments, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>