<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (3) TMI 135 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66774</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, confirming the Commissioner&#039;s jurisdiction under Section 263 of the IT Act, 1961, and upholding the disallowance of Rs. 30,500 claimed by the assessee for payment to the arbitrator in the assessment year 1981-82. The Tribunal found no legal justification for the deduction based on accounting principles, as the payments were made in prior years and no new circumstances in the relevant year supported the claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:57:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (3) TMI 135 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66774</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, confirming the Commissioner&#039;s jurisdiction under Section 263 of the IT Act, 1961, and upholding the disallowance of Rs. 30,500 claimed by the assessee for payment to the arbitrator in the assessment year 1981-82. The Tribunal found no legal justification for the deduction based on accounting principles, as the payments were made in prior years and no new circumstances in the relevant year supported the claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>