<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (4) TMI 123 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66772</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263, ruling that the Commissioner lacked valid jurisdiction. The investment of Rs. 3,21,551 was deemed adequately explained by the assessee, with supporting evidence accepted by the Tribunal. Consequently, the appeal was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:54:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (4) TMI 123 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66772</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263, ruling that the Commissioner lacked valid jurisdiction. The investment of Rs. 3,21,551 was deemed adequately explained by the assessee, with supporting evidence accepted by the Tribunal. Consequently, the appeal was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>