<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (10) TMI 90 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66765</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, granting registration to the firm despite inconsistencies in partners&#039; retirement dates and errors in the new partnership deed. The discrepancies were deemed unintentional mistakes that did not affect the firm&#039;s eligibility for registration. The decision was based on the firm&#039;s conduct supporting the argument that the retirement date discrepancy was an honest mistake, aligning with established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:31:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (10) TMI 90 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66765</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, granting registration to the firm despite inconsistencies in partners&#039; retirement dates and errors in the new partnership deed. The discrepancies were deemed unintentional mistakes that did not affect the firm&#039;s eligibility for registration. The decision was based on the firm&#039;s conduct supporting the argument that the retirement date discrepancy was an honest mistake, aligning with established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>