<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 133 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66754</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the AAC&#039;s decision to treat the expenditure on wire mesh for preparing cages as revenue expenditure, considering the asset&#039;s non-enduring nature due to rapid deterioration in the coastal location of Visakhapatnam. The judgment emphasized the importance of asset durability in distinguishing between revenue and capital expenditure, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 10:57:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 133 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66754</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the AAC&#039;s decision to treat the expenditure on wire mesh for preparing cages as revenue expenditure, considering the asset&#039;s non-enduring nature due to rapid deterioration in the coastal location of Visakhapatnam. The judgment emphasized the importance of asset durability in distinguishing between revenue and capital expenditure, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>