<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (12) TMI 63 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66738</link>
    <description>A firm with only two partners is stated to dissolve automatically on the retirement of one partner, so the assessee-firm ceased to exist and a new firm came into existence for the relevant year. On that basis, filing Form No. 11 was treated as the proper course, rather than Form No. 11A for a mere change in constitution. The form was filed within time, and the genuineness of the firm was not in dispute, supporting entitlement to registration for the relevant assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 10:12:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (12) TMI 63 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66738</link>
      <description>A firm with only two partners is stated to dissolve automatically on the retirement of one partner, so the assessee-firm ceased to exist and a new firm came into existence for the relevant year. On that basis, filing Form No. 11 was treated as the proper course, rather than Form No. 11A for a mere change in constitution. The form was filed within time, and the genuineness of the firm was not in dispute, supporting entitlement to registration for the relevant assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>