<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (7) TMI 81 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66727</link>
    <description>The confiscated value of paddy for non-delivery under the levy system was treated as a business loss because it arose directly from the assessee&#039;s trading operations and had an integral connection with the conduct of that business. The loss was therefore incidental to the business rather than a separate or personal outgoing, and it was allowed as an admissible deduction in computing business profits under section 10(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 18:44:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (7) TMI 81 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66727</link>
      <description>The confiscated value of paddy for non-delivery under the levy system was treated as a business loss because it arose directly from the assessee&#039;s trading operations and had an integral connection with the conduct of that business. The loss was therefore incidental to the business rather than a separate or personal outgoing, and it was allowed as an admissible deduction in computing business profits under section 10(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>