<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (5) TMI 35 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66725</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the penalty imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, finding that the revenue did not sufficiently prove that the omitted sum of Rs. 9,849 constituted concealed income. The Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation that the omission was due to lack of accounts and rough estimation. Emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence of concealment, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 18:40:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (5) TMI 35 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66725</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the penalty imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, finding that the revenue did not sufficiently prove that the omitted sum of Rs. 9,849 constituted concealed income. The Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation that the omission was due to lack of accounts and rough estimation. Emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence of concealment, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>