<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (7) TMI 80 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66723</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Departmental appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of the addition made as income from undisclosed sources. The Tribunal concluded that the small unexplained amount should not be considered income from undisclosed sources due to reliance on estimates by the Executive Engineer, resulting in the reduction of the unexplained amount to Rs. 3,161, less than one percent of the total cost.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 18:36:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (7) TMI 80 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66723</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Departmental appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of the addition made as income from undisclosed sources. The Tribunal concluded that the small unexplained amount should not be considered income from undisclosed sources due to reliance on estimates by the Executive Engineer, resulting in the reduction of the unexplained amount to Rs. 3,161, less than one percent of the total cost.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>