<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (1) TMI 69 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66722</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad-B ruled that cash payments made to employees as per their contract of service did not qualify as perquisites under the Income Tax Act, sections 40(c)(iii) or 40(a)(v). Various allowances like house rent, entertainment, city, city compensatory, and car allowances, being cash payments, were also not considered as perquisites. As a result, the appeals by the assessee were allowed, and the departmental appeals were dismissed for the assessment years 1965-66, 1968-69, 1969-70, and 1971-72.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 18:34:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (1) TMI 69 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66722</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad-B ruled that cash payments made to employees as per their contract of service did not qualify as perquisites under the Income Tax Act, sections 40(c)(iii) or 40(a)(v). Various allowances like house rent, entertainment, city, city compensatory, and car allowances, being cash payments, were also not considered as perquisites. As a result, the appeals by the assessee were allowed, and the departmental appeals were dismissed for the assessment years 1965-66, 1968-69, 1969-70, and 1971-72.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>