<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 402 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66703</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the orders passed by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A). The judgment emphasized the importance of upholding statutory provisions, ensuring assessments are not unsettled contrary to legislative intent, particularly regarding the finality of assessments and the applicability of the proviso to section 14A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 17:47:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 402 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66703</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the orders passed by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A). The judgment emphasized the importance of upholding statutory provisions, ensuring assessments are not unsettled contrary to legislative intent, particularly regarding the finality of assessments and the applicability of the proviso to section 14A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>