<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 297 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66689</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue regarding interest earned on deposits, upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on setting off losses against profits under section 80HH, and modified the CIT(A)&#039;s order to exclude 90 percent of the net receipts from the leasing division for computing deduction under section 80HHC. The appeals were allowed or partly allowed based on these determinations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2016 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 297 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66689</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue regarding interest earned on deposits, upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on setting off losses against profits under section 80HH, and modified the CIT(A)&#039;s order to exclude 90 percent of the net receipts from the leasing division for computing deduction under section 80HHC. The appeals were allowed or partly allowed based on these determinations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>