<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (8) TMI 130 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66663</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the assessee could not claim depreciation on the car or interest on the car loan as deductible expenses under Section 57(iii) of the Income-tax Act. The reimbursement of petrol bills was deemed not to be income or a perquisite, and as there was no corresponding income, the claim for depreciation was not supported.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 14:49:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (8) TMI 130 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66663</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the assessee could not claim depreciation on the car or interest on the car loan as deductible expenses under Section 57(iii) of the Income-tax Act. The reimbursement of petrol bills was deemed not to be income or a perquisite, and as there was no corresponding income, the claim for depreciation was not supported.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>