<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (2) TMI 124 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66648</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the assessee entitlement to investment allowance under Section 32A and deduction under Section 80J. However, the denial of deduction under Section 80HHA was confirmed. The Tribunal also reclassified the lease income as business income, allowing the assessee to claim associated benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 13:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (2) TMI 124 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66648</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the assessee entitlement to investment allowance under Section 32A and deduction under Section 80J. However, the denial of deduction under Section 80HHA was confirmed. The Tribunal also reclassified the lease income as business income, allowing the assessee to claim associated benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>