<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (4) TMI 130 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66644</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the disallowance of the expenditure related to the proposed project, designs and drawings, advance for equipment, relief under section 80J, and guest house expenditure and depreciation, dismissing the appeal in its entirety. The expenditure was deemed capital in nature and not deductible as revenue expenditure, following relevant case law and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 13:26:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (4) TMI 130 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66644</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the disallowance of the expenditure related to the proposed project, designs and drawings, advance for equipment, relief under section 80J, and guest house expenditure and depreciation, dismissing the appeal in its entirety. The expenditure was deemed capital in nature and not deductible as revenue expenditure, following relevant case law and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>