<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (2) TMI 128 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66641</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the departmental appeal. It affirmed the deductibility of the penalty for breach of contract and sales tax liabilities. The addition under Rule 6D was restored, and the issue under Section 80J was remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 13:21:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (2) TMI 128 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66641</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the departmental appeal. It affirmed the deductibility of the penalty for breach of contract and sales tax liabilities. The addition under Rule 6D was restored, and the issue under Section 80J was remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>