<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 150 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66634</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the departmental appeal, ruling that the additional sales-tax liability was contingent and not demanded during the relevant accounting year, thus not eligible for deduction. The judgment clarified the difference between contractual and statutory liabilities and stressed the necessity of actual demand to recognize a liability in the mercantile accounting system.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 13:08:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 150 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66634</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the departmental appeal, ruling that the additional sales-tax liability was contingent and not demanded during the relevant accounting year, thus not eligible for deduction. The judgment clarified the difference between contractual and statutory liabilities and stressed the necessity of actual demand to recognize a liability in the mercantile accounting system.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>