<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (9) TMI 134 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66611</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, granting weighted deduction for maintaining a branch office at Bagdad under section 35B(1)(b)(iv). However, the claim for weighted deduction on labour wages and travelling expenses was denied based on precedents. The Tribunal found that expenses related to the branch office were eligible for deduction, while labour wages and travelling expenses were considered as part of service procurement costs and not eligible for deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 11:20:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (9) TMI 134 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66611</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, granting weighted deduction for maintaining a branch office at Bagdad under section 35B(1)(b)(iv). However, the claim for weighted deduction on labour wages and travelling expenses was denied based on precedents. The Tribunal found that expenses related to the branch office were eligible for deduction, while labour wages and travelling expenses were considered as part of service procurement costs and not eligible for deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>