<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (7) TMI 190 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66609</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order canceling the registration and the assessment. The partnership was found to be genuine, with clerical errors that were subsequently rectified, causing no prejudice to the revenue. The Commissioner&#039;s assumption of jurisdiction under section 263 was deemed invalid due to a misunderstanding of facts, leading to the order being overturned on both jurisdictional and merit-based grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 11:11:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (7) TMI 190 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66609</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order canceling the registration and the assessment. The partnership was found to be genuine, with clerical errors that were subsequently rectified, causing no prejudice to the revenue. The Commissioner&#039;s assumption of jurisdiction under section 263 was deemed invalid due to a misunderstanding of facts, leading to the order being overturned on both jurisdictional and merit-based grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>