<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (6) TMI 72 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66596</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in part, with the Tribunal ruling that the amount received by the assessee was not to be considered as reimbursement but as compensation for losses incurred. The Tribunal determined that only a portion of the received sum related to reimbursement of expenditure incurred prior to business setup, leading to a reduction in the capital cost for depreciation calculation purposes. The revenue&#039;s contention was rejected, and the Income Tax Officer was directed to recompute the actual cost for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 10:32:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (6) TMI 72 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66596</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in part, with the Tribunal ruling that the amount received by the assessee was not to be considered as reimbursement but as compensation for losses incurred. The Tribunal determined that only a portion of the received sum related to reimbursement of expenditure incurred prior to business setup, leading to a reduction in the capital cost for depreciation calculation purposes. The revenue&#039;s contention was rejected, and the Income Tax Officer was directed to recompute the actual cost for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>