<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (11) TMI 102 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66594</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding the rectification order dated 25-9-1991 as illegal and unjustified. It emphasized the bona fide nature of the assessee&#039;s claim for set-off of past losses and noted that the retrospective amendment to section 28 altered the legal position, impacting the assessee&#039;s claim. The Tribunal also ruled that the initial intimation merged into the regular assessment order, rendering any subsequent rectification invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 10:18:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (11) TMI 102 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66594</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding the rectification order dated 25-9-1991 as illegal and unjustified. It emphasized the bona fide nature of the assessee&#039;s claim for set-off of past losses and noted that the retrospective amendment to section 28 altered the legal position, impacting the assessee&#039;s claim. The Tribunal also ruled that the initial intimation merged into the regular assessment order, rendering any subsequent rectification invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>