<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (8) TMI 129 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66592</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s jurisdiction to revise assessments under section 25(2) of the Wealth-tax Act post-1-6-1988. Professional remuneration received but undeclared was included in the net wealth, with a directive for proper evidence consideration and explanations. The revisionary order of 21-3-1991 was deemed valid within the statutory time limit. Procedural fairness was emphasized, requiring further inquiry into unverified evidence and providing the assessee with a fair chance to respond. The matter was partially allowed, remanding for a reevaluation of wealth additions for the relevant assessment years with proper procedural adherence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 18:57:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (8) TMI 129 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66592</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s jurisdiction to revise assessments under section 25(2) of the Wealth-tax Act post-1-6-1988. Professional remuneration received but undeclared was included in the net wealth, with a directive for proper evidence consideration and explanations. The revisionary order of 21-3-1991 was deemed valid within the statutory time limit. Procedural fairness was emphasized, requiring further inquiry into unverified evidence and providing the assessee with a fair chance to respond. The matter was partially allowed, remanding for a reevaluation of wealth additions for the relevant assessment years with proper procedural adherence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>