<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 153 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66585</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a former Judge, in a tax dispute regarding professional fees received after discontinuing a previous profession. It held that such fees were not taxable through prima facie adjustment under section 143(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, as the issue was debatable and required detailed examination beyond the summary jurisdiction. The Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 4,69,512, canceled the additional tax demand, and allowed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 18:21:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 153 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66585</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a former Judge, in a tax dispute regarding professional fees received after discontinuing a previous profession. It held that such fees were not taxable through prima facie adjustment under section 143(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, as the issue was debatable and required detailed examination beyond the summary jurisdiction. The Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 4,69,512, canceled the additional tax demand, and allowed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>