<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (6) TMI 112 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66574</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the provision for excise duty rebate, upheld the weighted deduction under Section 35C, remitted the investment allowance denial for machinery used in producing arrack, allowed the expenditure for acquiring an 11 KV motor, upheld the provision for liquidated damages, deleted additions for outstanding liabilities, directed verification for supplies to Dongarkada Project, upheld provision for work completed but not billed, deleted addition for wrong billing by APSEB, deleted disallowance for sales tax on packing material, confirmed deletion for remission of excise duty on packing charges, deleted disallowance for capital expenditure on scientific research, rejected investment allowance for computer acquisition, and dismissed claims under Section 80J and depreciation rates. The Tribunal set aside the rectification order for violating natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:03:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (6) TMI 112 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66574</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the provision for excise duty rebate, upheld the weighted deduction under Section 35C, remitted the investment allowance denial for machinery used in producing arrack, allowed the expenditure for acquiring an 11 KV motor, upheld the provision for liquidated damages, deleted additions for outstanding liabilities, directed verification for supplies to Dongarkada Project, upheld provision for work completed but not billed, deleted addition for wrong billing by APSEB, deleted disallowance for sales tax on packing material, confirmed deletion for remission of excise duty on packing charges, deleted disallowance for capital expenditure on scientific research, rejected investment allowance for computer acquisition, and dismissed claims under Section 80J and depreciation rates. The Tribunal set aside the rectification order for violating natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>