<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 183 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66562</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance under Section 43B, the levy of additional tax under Section 143(1A), and the prima facie adjustments under Section 143(1)(a), dismissing the appeal of the assessee. The judgment emphasized the clear due dates for remittances under the CMPF Act and Scheme, the applicability of additional tax even when the loss is reduced, and the validity of prima facie adjustments for patently inadmissible claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:26:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 183 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66562</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance under Section 43B, the levy of additional tax under Section 143(1A), and the prima facie adjustments under Section 143(1)(a), dismissing the appeal of the assessee. The judgment emphasized the clear due dates for remittances under the CMPF Act and Scheme, the applicability of additional tax even when the loss is reduced, and the validity of prima facie adjustments for patently inadmissible claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>