<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (4) TMI 112 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66553</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the annual profit recognition method, confirmed the 8% profit estimate, reinstated the disallowance of interest under Section 40A(8), and ruled out the levy of interest under Sections 139(8) and 217 for the assessment year 1981-82. The appeals of the assessee for assessment years 1982-83 and 1983-84 were dismissed, while the appeal for 1981-82 was partly allowed. The Revenue&#039;s appeals for all three years were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:45:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (4) TMI 112 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66553</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the annual profit recognition method, confirmed the 8% profit estimate, reinstated the disallowance of interest under Section 40A(8), and ruled out the levy of interest under Sections 139(8) and 217 for the assessment year 1981-82. The appeals of the assessee for assessment years 1982-83 and 1983-84 were dismissed, while the appeal for 1981-82 was partly allowed. The Revenue&#039;s appeals for all three years were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>