<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (9) TMI 146 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66530</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, ruling that there was no concealment of income under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 1982-83 and 1983-84. The Tribunal emphasized that the omission of the spouse&#039;s income was not deliberate but due to a bona fide belief, preventing the return from being labeled as false and thus not warranting a penalty. The appeals were allowed, and the penalty was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 13:23:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (9) TMI 146 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66530</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, ruling that there was no concealment of income under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 1982-83 and 1983-84. The Tribunal emphasized that the omission of the spouse&#039;s income was not deliberate but due to a bona fide belief, preventing the return from being labeled as false and thus not warranting a penalty. The appeals were allowed, and the penalty was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>