<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (9) TMI 99 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66513</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee did not qualify as an Association of Persons (AOP) for tax purposes. It ruled that the income should be assessed individually for each co-owner based on factors such as separate receipt of rent, individual liability for losses, and the application of the rule of consistency in tax assessments. The Tribunal emphasized that the property could not be divided without risking damage, supporting the decision for separate assessments of the co-owners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 12:36:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (9) TMI 99 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66513</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee did not qualify as an Association of Persons (AOP) for tax purposes. It ruled that the income should be assessed individually for each co-owner based on factors such as separate receipt of rent, individual liability for losses, and the application of the rule of consistency in tax assessments. The Tribunal emphasized that the property could not be divided without risking damage, supporting the decision for separate assessments of the co-owners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>