https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66494 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the orders of the CIT (Appeals) and directing the ITO to assess the income from house property and medical business in the hands of the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). Additionally, the Tribunal ruled to delete the addition of Rs. 30,000 from the individual assessment, concluding that the funds belonged to the assessee's wife and not the assessee himself. en-us Tue, 31 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Feb 2011 11:38:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66494 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the orders of the CIT (Appeals) and directing the ITO to assess the income from house property and medical business in the hands of the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). Additionally, the Tribunal ruled to delete the addition of Rs. 30,000 from the individual assessment, concluding that the funds belonged to the assessee's wife and not the assessee himself. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 31 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66494