<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (10) TMI 89 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66484</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Section 176(3A) of the Income-tax Act was not applicable as the business of the firms had not been discontinued, but rather suspended. The income received should be assessed in the hands of the firms or their partners, not the individual assessee. The appeal was allowed, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) findings, albeit on different grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:48:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (10) TMI 89 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66484</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Section 176(3A) of the Income-tax Act was not applicable as the business of the firms had not been discontinued, but rather suspended. The income received should be assessed in the hands of the firms or their partners, not the individual assessee. The appeal was allowed, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) findings, albeit on different grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>