<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (9) TMI 132 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66482</link>
    <description>The tribunal directed the Wealth-tax Officer to average the values derived from both the rental value method and the land and building method, incorporating the tribunal&#039;s findings on the rate of return, repairs and maintenance allowance, and fractional interest discount. The appeals were partly allowed, modifying the initial valuation approach to better reflect the market conditions and specific circumstances of the godowns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:43:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (9) TMI 132 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66482</link>
      <description>The tribunal directed the Wealth-tax Officer to average the values derived from both the rental value method and the land and building method, incorporating the tribunal&#039;s findings on the rate of return, repairs and maintenance allowance, and fractional interest discount. The appeals were partly allowed, modifying the initial valuation approach to better reflect the market conditions and specific circumstances of the godowns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>