<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 131 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66468</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the jurisdiction of the ITO under section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, the inclusion of minors&#039; income in the assessee&#039;s hands under section 64(1)(iii), the classification of the right to archakathvam as family property, the validity of the partial partition and partnership, and the assessment of the firm&#039;s income in the family assessment. The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal, confirming the decisions of the first appellate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:17:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 131 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66468</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the jurisdiction of the ITO under section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, the inclusion of minors&#039; income in the assessee&#039;s hands under section 64(1)(iii), the classification of the right to archakathvam as family property, the validity of the partial partition and partnership, and the assessment of the firm&#039;s income in the family assessment. The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal, confirming the decisions of the first appellate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>