<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (8) TMI 136 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66463</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the allowance of deductions for payments to the National Institute by the individual business management consultant under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that although section 35(1)(iii) specifically pertains to business and not profession, the payments were essential for the consultant&#039;s profession and thus admissible under section 37.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:07:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (8) TMI 136 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66463</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the allowance of deductions for payments to the National Institute by the individual business management consultant under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that although section 35(1)(iii) specifically pertains to business and not profession, the payments were essential for the consultant&#039;s profession and thus admissible under section 37.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>