<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (8) TMI 134 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66461</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the nullification of the partial partition under Section 171(9) of the Income-tax Act, deeming the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) to continue undivided for tax purposes. The income from the partnership firm was assessed in the hands of the HUF, following legal principles determining the income&#039;s connection to joint family funds. The Tribunal concluded that the income belonged to the HUF, dismissing the appeal by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:02:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (8) TMI 134 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66461</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the nullification of the partial partition under Section 171(9) of the Income-tax Act, deeming the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) to continue undivided for tax purposes. The income from the partnership firm was assessed in the hands of the HUF, following legal principles determining the income&#039;s connection to joint family funds. The Tribunal concluded that the income belonged to the HUF, dismissing the appeal by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>