<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 178 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66450</link>
    <description>Property allotted on partial partition retained its joint family character where the assessee lived with his wife and unmarried daughters, so it remained Hindu undivided family property. The later birth of a son gave the assessee a coparcenary right by birth, and he could no longer be treated as a sole surviving coparcener from that date. Once taxable as a Hindu undivided family, the clubbing rule for a minor child&#039;s income did not apply because it operates only against an individual and not the karta of a Hindu undivided family. The assessee was therefore assessable as a Hindu undivided family, and the minor sons&#039; share income could not be included in his individual assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:42:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 178 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66450</link>
      <description>Property allotted on partial partition retained its joint family character where the assessee lived with his wife and unmarried daughters, so it remained Hindu undivided family property. The later birth of a son gave the assessee a coparcenary right by birth, and he could no longer be treated as a sole surviving coparcener from that date. Once taxable as a Hindu undivided family, the clubbing rule for a minor child&#039;s income did not apply because it operates only against an individual and not the karta of a Hindu undivided family. The assessee was therefore assessable as a Hindu undivided family, and the minor sons&#039; share income could not be included in his individual assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>