<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 176 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66448</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the remuneration paid to a partner for services rendered outside the scope of partnership duties should not be disallowed under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the need to establish a direct connection between the payment and the firm&#039;s income to trigger the provisions of section 40(b), distinguishing this case from previous decisions and legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:37:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 176 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66448</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the remuneration paid to a partner for services rendered outside the scope of partnership duties should not be disallowed under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the need to establish a direct connection between the payment and the firm&#039;s income to trigger the provisions of section 40(b), distinguishing this case from previous decisions and legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>